Female infanticide and gender-selective abortion (2007)
"It is the ultimate manifestation of discrimination… It
is particularly vicious. It doesn't affect your conscience because
there is no evidence."
Francois Farrah, Chief of Population and Development for
UNFPA.
Female infanticide is the murder of baby girls soon after birth
on the sole basis of gender. Female infanticide is more
common than male infanticide because of the perceived social and
economic disadvantages to having girl children. Female
infanticide is most common in China and India.
Female infanticide is more prevalent in poor families, mainly in
rural areas. Wealthier families in the cities have access to
and can afford ultrasounds and other procedures that facilitate
pre-birth gender selection so the foetus can be aborted once the
gender is known. Where gender is known, 42% of female
foetuses in India are aborted compared to 25% male (
HinduWomen.org). This gender-selective abortion and
female infanticide is creating a great skew in gender demographics
in favour of boys and this is consequently leading to a number of
abuses being perpetrated against women and girls.
In China, where the one child rule has existed since 1979,
unwanted baby girls are often sold, trafficked, neglected or
abandoned in the state's orphanages. If the family can afford
to keep the baby girl, her birth, and consequently her legal
existence, may remain unregistered. This means that in
future, she can claim no benefits from the state or any inheritance
from her family. As there is such a shortage of young women
in China, this has led to a rise in trafficking and bride auctions,
especially in rural areas.
In Asia, 60 million girls and 50 million girls from Indiawho
would otherwise be expected to be alive are 'missing' from the
populations (UNFPA 2005). In India, it is customary for the
bride's family to give a dowry to the groom's family when she is
married. If a family has more than one daughter this can be
very expensive. Although this custom has been outlawed, it is
still practiced in many rural areas. In all cases, it is more
likely that gender selection is exercised against girls if this is
the first child or if the first child was a girl.
Economically, boys are seen as better investments because of
their higher earning potential and their provision for their
parents in their old age, where as girls join the families of their
husbands when they marry. Of course, if the gender bias
against education for girls were removed, they would have the
skills to be employed in higher paying jobs and it would be up to
them whether they supported their parents or not, whether they were
married or not.
Governments of both countries have introduced laws to try and
address these problems. In China, their Women Protection Law
prohibits discrimination against women that have chosen to keep
their daughters. Under Maternal Health Care Law the use of
antenatal technology for determining the gender of a baby is
banned. In India, the state of Tamil Nadu will provide money
annually to families with one or two daughters and no son for their
daughter's education if either parent is willing to be
sterilised. On their daughter's 20th birthday a lump sum is
paid.
Female infanticide is forbidden in all major religions, although
male bias in patriarchal structures embodied by the state and
exacerbated by poverty and a tolerance of violence against women
give impetus to the devaluing of our girl children. With
fewer and fewer girls being born to countries that need them the
most, our most precious resource is being depleted before even
having had the chance to thrive.
ORGANISATIONS & WEBSITES
BBC - Female Infanticide
http://www.bbc.co.uk/religion/ethics/abortion/medical/infanticide_1.shtml
Gendercide Watch
http://www.gendercide.org/
POLICY & REPORTS
Gender-Based
Violence: A Price Too High
UNFPA State of the World Population 2005
NEWS STORIES
Silent
Spring: The Tragedy of India's Never-Born Girls
UNFPA News, 11 October 2005
Female infanticide and sex-selective abortion - the aftermath of
China's one-chid policy
The Stanford Daily, 29 April 2004
Fighting
female infanticide
The Hindu, 12 May 2001